Cem Ilkel vs Dan Added — Vilnius CH Semi-final
Vilnius CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
4.8
Surface form4.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d7.0
3-set count7.0
Prev. matchContext
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Ilkel C.
7762
Added D.
6340
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form56%1st serve in+4%60%
70%1st serve points won70%
51%2nd serve points won+1%50%
62%Service points won62%
37%Return points won37%
59%Break points saved+2%61%
4.4Aces / match+1.25.6
2.1Double faults / match+0.42.5
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Added D.
Klein L.[5]
7-56-3
Durasovic V.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
Bellucci M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Ilkel C.
Lokoli L.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Bellucci M.
Fatic N.[6]
7-656-3
Durasovic V.
Marchenko I.
5-77-646-1
Ilkel C.
Valkusz M.
7-616-726-1
Lokoli L.[7]
Lajal M.
1-66-36-0
Added D.
Berankis R.[2]
7-57-65
Escoffier A.[8]
Butvilas E.
6-07-66
Kolar Z.
Mager G.[4]
7-686-4
Klein L.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-07-5
R32
Fatic N.[6]
Decamps G.
6-47-5
Butvilas E.
Nikles J.
3-67-656-1
Bellucci M.
Marie J.
6-47-60
Ilkel C.
Arnaldi M.[3]
6-36-2
Durasovic V.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
Kolar Z.
Poljak D.
6-766-27-5
Added D.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Atmane T.
7-666-1
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-63
Lokoli L.[7]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-4
Berankis R.[2]
Sabaliauskas A.
6-46-2
Klein L.[5]
Gray A.
6-33-67-63
Escoffier A.[8]
Gaubas V.
6-16-3
Mager G.[4]
Janvier M.
6-756-36-4
Marchenko I.
Basic M.
7-56-2
Valkusz M.
Gulbis E.
6-26-3