Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli — Coquimbo CH Round of 16
Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
#151ATP
1623ELO
1623Clay ELO
$97kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
clay
#59ATP
1744ELO
1732Clay ELO
$502kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLWWLWLWL
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScoreForm & Matchup
3.0Clay Elo 1623
Surface ELO7.0+108 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1623
ELO gap7.1Overall Elo 1744
0.0
H2H10.0
5.4
Surface form5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Diaz Acosta F.
662
Ugo Carabelli C.
310
Head to head
1–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-02 | Rosario CH | R16 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 5-7 6-4 7-6(4) |
| 2023-02-27 | Santiago | Q1 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2022-04-25 | Buenos Aires CH | R16 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2021-02-22 | Cordoba | Q2 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
| 2018-11-05 | Montevideo CH | Q3 | clay | Facundo Diaz Acosta | 6-4 6-2 |
Statistics
Recent form62%1st serve in+2%60%
68%1st serve points won+2%70%
51%2nd serve points won+2%49%
61%Service points won+1%62%
45%Return points won+9%36%
61%Break points saved+3%64%
2.9Aces / match+0.23.1
2.8Double faults / match+0.52.3
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Semi-finals
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
R16
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5