Juncheng Shang vs Valentin Vacherot — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN7
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1852Hard ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
Shang J.
6-4 6-3
Vacherot V.
Shang J.
662
Vacherot V.
430

Juncheng Shang defeated Valentin Vacherot 6-4 6-3 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Valentin Vacherot came in ranked #21.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve advantage — Vacherot V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Vacherot V.
34
Serve
67
18
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
69
Break points saved·Even
96
96
Break points won·Clear edge
45
33
Deciding sets·Even
94
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Vacherot V.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Hard Elo 1698
Surface ELO
6.9+154 Hard Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1903
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[3]
Diallo G.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[3]
Riffice S.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Riffice S.
Galarneau A.
6-47-63
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.[5]
7-667-5
Ayeni O.
Sandgren T.
6-47-67
Mmoh M.[3]
Shang J.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Diallo G.
Shelton B.[4]
5-77-656-3
Mmoh M.[3]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Oradini G.
6-756-46-0
Ayeni O.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Riffice S.
Langmo C.
6-756-36-4
Couacaud E.[5]
Perez A.
6-47-5
Shang J.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Zhu E.
6-16-4
R32
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
7-614-66-1
Galarneau A.
Krueger M.[8]
7-656-747-61
Riffice S.
Kozlov S.[2]
3-66-26-3
Langmo C.
Nanda G.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-2
Oradini G.
Escobedo E.[6]
2-66-46-4
Holmgren A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-16-0
Ayeni O.
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-5
Cozbinov A.
Mejia N.
3-66-26-3
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
6-47-67
Shang J.[7]
Broom C.
7-54-66-3
Mmoh M.[3]
Jubb P.
6-20-0
Vacherot V.
Fearnley J.
7-627-65
Zhu E.
Lock B.
6-36-4
Diallo G.
Riedi L.
2-66-46-2
Shelton B.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-3