Elena Gabriela Ruse vs Harmony Tan — Cluj Napoca Round of 32

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Round of 32
Elena Gabriela Ruse
ROU
Elena Gabriela Ruse
#71WTA
1850ELO
1754Hard ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
Harmony Tan
FRA
Harmony Tan
#200WTA
1585ELO
1547Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Ruse E.
6-7 6-2 6-3
Tan H.
Ruse E.
65662
Tan H.
77231

Elena Gabriela Ruse defeated Harmony Tan 6-7 6-2 6-3 in the Cluj Napoca round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Elena Gabriela Ruse came in ranked #71.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruse E.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tan H.

Tan H.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ruse E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruse E.Tan H.
0
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruse E.Tan H.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruse E.Tan H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
39
Break points saved·Even
72
71
Break points won·Clear edge
98
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruse E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Tan H.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+207 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1547
8.2Overall Elo 1850
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1585
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruse E.Tan H.
Freshness·Even
97
100

Ruse E.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tan H.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Blinkova A.
Paolini J.
6-23-66-2
Semi-finals
Paolini J.
Wang X.[7]
7-54-66-3
Blinkova A.
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-46-4
Quarter-finals
Wang X.[7]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-17-65
Blinkova A.
Kalinina A.[2]
6-776-16-3
Paolini J.
Niemeier J.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Bondar A.[8]
7-53-66-1
R16
Niemeier J.
Rakhimova K.
6-46-4
Kalinina A.[2]
Bonaventure Y.
6-36-2
Parrizas Diaz N.
Galfi D.
6-16-4
Wang X.[7]
Ruse E.
6-16-787-66
Paolini J.
Yastremska D.
6-46-1
Bondar A.[8]
Dart H.
7-636-4
Potapova A.[4]
Golubic V.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.
Wang X.
6-42-66-1
R32
Kalinina A.[2]
Bouchard E.
6-3
Yastremska D.
Korpatsch T.
6-34-67-5
Wang X.[7]
Cristian J.
6-36-3
Blinkova A.
Zakharova A.
6-17-67
Dart H.
Dodin O.
6-26-0
Galfi D.
Bronzetti L.[9]
4-66-26-4
Niemeier J.
Bogdan A.[3]
7-656-2
Rakhimova K.
Danilovic O.
6-26-4
Bonaventure Y.
Gracheva V.
7-57-5
Golubic V.
Parry D.
7-57-66
Potapova A.[4]
Li A.
6-27-65
Wang X.
Linette M.[5]
6-26-4
Paolini J.
Kostyuk M.[6]
5-76-36-4
Ruse E.
Tan H.
6-756-26-3
Parrizas Diaz N.
Bara I.
6-17-5
Bondar A.[8]
Avanesyan E.
6-46-2