Mikael Ymer vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Florence Round of 32

Florence · ATP · Round of 32
SWE
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ymer M.
6-1 6-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Ymer M.
662
Van Rijthoven T.
120

Mikael Ymer defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 6-1 6-2 in the Florence round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
65%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
69%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.4
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
26
Break points saved·Even
90
90
Break points won·Dominant
71
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Van Rijthoven T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Wolf J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Musetti L.[3]
6-26-3
Wolf J.
Ymer M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Bublik A.[7]
3-67-56-1
Ymer M.
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-2
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Nakashima B.[8]
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Otte O.
6-46-726-2
Nakashima B.[8]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-4
Bublik A.[7]
Moutet C.
7-56-4
Wolf J.
Cressy M.[4]
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-0
Ymer M.
Karatsev A.[5]
6-16-766-1
Mcdonald M.
Passaro F.
6-47-5
Carballes Baena R.
Berrettini M.[2]
5-77-657-5
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Bublik A.[7]
Garin C.
7-56-2
Ymer M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Carballes Baena R.
Galan D.
6-26-1
Passaro F.
Zhang Z.
7-647-66
Karatsev A.[5]
Griekspoor T.
6-32-1
Nakashima B.[8]
Gasquet R.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Brooksby J.[6]
6-44-66-1
Moutet C.
Cobolli F.
4-67-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Maestrelli F.
4-66-26-1
Otte O.
Fucsovics M.
3-66-46-2