Li Tu vs Naoki Nakagawa — Seoul CH Round of 16

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
JPN
Naoki Nakagawa
#776ATP
1289ELO
1271Hard ELO
29 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLL
Tu L.
6-3 6-2
Nakagawa N.
Tu L.
662
Nakagawa N.
320

Li Tu defeated Naoki Nakagawa 6-3 6-2 in the Seoul CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nakagawa N.

Nakagawa N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Nakagawa N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
6.1
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 122). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Nakagawa N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
3
Break points saved·Dominant
82
57
Break points won·Slight edge
8
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
20
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Nakagawa N.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+200 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1271
8.0Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1289
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
5.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tu L.
Wu Y.
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Wu Y.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-33-66-4
Tu L.
Duckworth J.[6]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[8]
Mochizuki S.
6-36-0
Wu Y.
Svrcina D.
6-26-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Marterer M.
4-67-666-3
Tu L.
Oconnell C.[5]
6-46-746-1
R16
Wu Y.
Stebe C.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Coppejans K.
6-36-4
Tu L.
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.[5]
Hijikata R.
6-46-1
Svrcina D.
Johnson S.[7]
6-23-66-1
Mochizuki S.
Neuchrist M.
6-42-66-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Chung H.
7-666-1
Majchrzak K.[8]
Millman J.
2-66-36-2
R32
Nakagawa N.
Popyrin A.[3]
3-67-57-66
Tu L.
Uchida K.
6-46-0
Majchrzak K.[8]
Clarke J.
6-26-2
Neuchrist M.
Polmans M.
3-66-36-4
Johnson S.[7]
Kim C.
6-36-2
Wu Y.
Albot R.[1]
6-04-66-2
Marterer M.
Tseng C.[2]
6-36-2
Millman J.
Moriya H.
6-36-1
Stebe C.
Vukic A.
7-56-766-4
Mochizuki S.
Gomez E.[4]
5-76-46-4
Hijikata R.
Kim J.
6-16-2
Oconnell C.[5]
Peniston R.
5-76-37-66
Svrcina D.
Eubanks C.
6-766-46-4
Chung H.
Piros Z.
4-66-33-0
Coppejans K.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Kovacevic A.
7-666-3