Sam Riffice vs Christian Langmo — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Sam Riffice
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Riffice S.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Langmo C.
Riffice S.
65662
Langmo C.
77341

Sam Riffice defeated Christian Langmo 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Riffice S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Riffice S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Riffice S.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
77%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
7.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (9 vs 176). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Riffice S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Langmo C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.2
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Riffice S.Langmo C.
Freshness·
—
86

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[3]
Diallo G.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[3]
Riffice S.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Riffice S.
Galarneau A.
6-47-63
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.[5]
7-667-5
Ayeni O.
Sandgren T.
6-47-67
Mmoh M.[3]
Shang J.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Diallo G.
Shelton B.[4]
5-77-656-3
Mmoh M.[3]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Oradini G.
6-756-46-0
Ayeni O.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Riffice S.
Langmo C.
6-756-36-4
Couacaud E.[5]
Perez A.
6-47-5
Shang J.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Zhu E.
6-16-4
R32
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
7-614-66-1
Galarneau A.
Krueger M.[8]
7-656-747-61
Riffice S.
Kozlov S.[2]
3-66-26-3
Langmo C.
Nanda G.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-2
Oradini G.
Escobedo E.[6]
2-66-46-4
Holmgren A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-16-0
Ayeni O.
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-5
Cozbinov A.
Mejia N.
3-66-26-3
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
6-47-67
Shang J.[7]
Broom C.
7-54-66-3
Mmoh M.[3]
Jubb P.
6-20-0
Vacherot V.
Fearnley J.
7-627-65
Zhu E.
Lock B.
6-36-4
Diallo G.
Riedi L.
2-66-46-2
Shelton B.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-3