Mikael Ymer vs Aslan Karatsev — Florence Round of 16

Florence · ATP · Round of 16
SWE
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
RUS5
Aslan Karatsev
#1285ATP
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLLL
Ymer M.
6-1 6-7 6-1
Karatsev A.
Ymer M.
66662
Karatsev A.
17811

Mikael Ymer defeated Aslan Karatsev 6-1 6-7 6-1 in the Florence round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Mikael Ymer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Mikael Ymer extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikael Ymer came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-01WashingtonR32hardMikael Ymer6-4 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Karatsev A.

Karatsev A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Karatsev A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Karatsev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
43
Break points saved·Even
90
94
Break points won·Dominant
71
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
37
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
29
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Karatsev A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
6.9
7.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Wolf J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Musetti L.[3]
6-26-3
Wolf J.
Ymer M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Bublik A.[7]
3-67-56-1
Ymer M.
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-2
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Nakashima B.[8]
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Otte O.
6-46-726-2
Nakashima B.[8]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-4
Bublik A.[7]
Moutet C.
7-56-4
Wolf J.
Cressy M.[4]
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-0
Ymer M.
Karatsev A.[5]
6-16-766-1
Mcdonald M.
Passaro F.
6-47-5
Carballes Baena R.
Berrettini M.[2]
5-77-657-5
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Bublik A.[7]
Garin C.
7-56-2
Ymer M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Carballes Baena R.
Galan D.
6-26-1
Passaro F.
Zhang Z.
7-647-66
Karatsev A.[5]
Griekspoor T.
6-32-1
Nakashima B.[8]
Gasquet R.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Brooksby J.[6]
6-44-66-1
Moutet C.
Cobolli F.
4-67-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Maestrelli F.
4-66-26-1
Otte O.
Fucsovics M.
3-66-46-2