Quentin Halys vs Kacper Zuk — Ismaning CH Semi-final

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Quentin Halys
FRA1
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
Halys Q.
7-6 7-6
Zuk K.
Halys Q.
77772
Zuk K.
65640

Quentin Halys defeated Kacper Zuk 7-6 7-6 in the Ismaning CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Zuk K.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Zuk K.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Zuk K.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Zuk K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
76
Break points won·Slight edge
4
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Zuk K.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
2.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
9.3
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Zuk K.
Freshness·
93
—

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Halys Q.[1]
Rehberg M.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Zuk K.
7-657-64
Rehberg M.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[3]
Sachko V.
6-31-0
Rehberg M.
Ejupovic E.
7-687-64
Halys Q.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-737-64
Zuk K.
Yevseyev D.
6-43-66-3
R16
Gray A.
Fatic N.[7]
7-636-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Forejtek J.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Masur D.[5]
6-16-736-3
Rehberg M.
Haase R.
6-37-67
Zuk K.
Decamps G.
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Klein L.
3-66-37-5
Yevseyev D.
Yunchaokete B.
6-17-65
Halys Q.[1]
Ramanathan R.
7-623-67-5
R32
Forejtek J.
Topo M.
6-23-66-3
Ramanathan R.
Harris B.
7-646-757-65
Rehberg M.
Machac T.[2]
6-36-4
Haase R.
Kolar Z.
6-47-66
Ejupovic E.
Bellier A.[6]
5-77-636-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.
6-26-4
Masur D.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-43-66-4
Decamps G.
Bachinger M.
6-01-66-4
Yunchaokete B.
Hassan B.
7-626-2
Fatic N.[7]
Lenz J.
7-56-3
Gray A.
Horansky F.
6-36-4
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-686-4
Klein L.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Pospisil V.[3]
Florig P.
6-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Novak D.[4]
7-657-64