Quentin Halys vs Alastair Gray — Ismaning CH Quarter-final

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Quentin Halys
FRA1
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
GBR
Alastair Gray
#271ATP
1390ELO
1370Hard ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Halys Q.
6-4 6-7 7-6
Gray A.
Halys Q.
663772
Gray A.
477641

Quentin Halys defeated Alastair Gray 6-4 6-7 7-6 in the Ismaning CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Gray A.

Gray A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Gray A.
35
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Gray A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.0
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Gray A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
15
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
85
Break points won·Even
4
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gray A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.8+306 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Hard Elo 1370
8.6Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1390
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.5
Surface form
5.7
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Gray A.
Freshness·Clear edge
92
73

Halys Q.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Gray A.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Halys Q.[1]
Rehberg M.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Zuk K.
7-657-64
Rehberg M.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[3]
Sachko V.
6-31-0
Rehberg M.
Ejupovic E.
7-687-64
Halys Q.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-737-64
Zuk K.
Yevseyev D.
6-43-66-3
R16
Gray A.
Fatic N.[7]
7-636-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Forejtek J.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Masur D.[5]
6-16-736-3
Rehberg M.
Haase R.
6-37-67
Zuk K.
Decamps G.
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Klein L.
3-66-37-5
Yevseyev D.
Yunchaokete B.
6-17-65
Halys Q.[1]
Ramanathan R.
7-623-67-5
R32
Forejtek J.
Topo M.
6-23-66-3
Ramanathan R.
Harris B.
7-646-757-65
Rehberg M.
Machac T.[2]
6-36-4
Haase R.
Kolar Z.
6-47-66
Ejupovic E.
Bellier A.[6]
5-77-636-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.
6-26-4
Masur D.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-43-66-4
Decamps G.
Bachinger M.
6-01-66-4
Yunchaokete B.
Hassan B.
7-626-2
Fatic N.[7]
Lenz J.
7-56-3
Gray A.
Horansky F.
6-36-4
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-686-4
Klein L.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Pospisil V.[3]
Florig P.
6-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Novak D.[4]
7-657-64