Kacper Zuk vs Antoine Escoffier — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
FRA8
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Zuk K.
6-4 3-6 6-4
Escoffier A.
Zuk K.
6362
Escoffier A.
4641

Kacper Zuk defeated Antoine Escoffier 6-4 3-6 6-4 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Kacper Zuk came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Kacper Zuk closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zuk K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zuk K.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zuk K.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
18
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
68
Break points won·Slight edge
9
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
25
12
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zuk K.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escoffier A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
2.3
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Halys Q.[1]
Rehberg M.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Zuk K.
7-657-64
Rehberg M.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[3]
Sachko V.
6-31-0
Rehberg M.
Ejupovic E.
7-687-64
Halys Q.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-737-64
Zuk K.
Yevseyev D.
6-43-66-3
R16
Gray A.
Fatic N.[7]
7-636-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Forejtek J.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Masur D.[5]
6-16-736-3
Rehberg M.
Haase R.
6-37-67
Zuk K.
Decamps G.
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Klein L.
3-66-37-5
Yevseyev D.
Yunchaokete B.
6-17-65
Halys Q.[1]
Ramanathan R.
7-623-67-5
R32
Forejtek J.
Topo M.
6-23-66-3
Ramanathan R.
Harris B.
7-646-757-65
Rehberg M.
Machac T.[2]
6-36-4
Haase R.
Kolar Z.
6-47-66
Ejupovic E.
Bellier A.[6]
5-77-636-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.
6-26-4
Masur D.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-43-66-4
Decamps G.
Bachinger M.
6-01-66-4
Yunchaokete B.
Hassan B.
7-626-2
Fatic N.[7]
Lenz J.
7-56-3
Gray A.
Horansky F.
6-36-4
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-686-4
Klein L.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Pospisil V.[3]
Florig P.
6-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Novak D.[4]
7-657-64