Renzo Olivo vs Gastao Elias — Rio De Janeiro CH Round of 32

Rio De Janeiro CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
clay
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#669ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Olivo R.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Elias G.
Olivo R.
3662
Elias G.
6341

Renzo Olivo defeated Gastao Elias 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Rio De Janeiro CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gastao Elias came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Renzo Olivo claimed a first win over Gastao Elias in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-05-22LyonQ2clayGastao Elias1-6 6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Elias G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.8
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
33
57
Break points won·Slight edge
15
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
41
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Olivo R.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Elias G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
6.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.[3]
Hanfmann Y.[8]
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Cecchinato M.[3]
Coria F.[1]
1-66-36-3
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Muller A.[6]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Coria F.[1]
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-746-46-3
Muller A.[6]
Darderi L.
7-56-3
Cecchinato M.[3]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-632-67-63
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Varillas J.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Choinski J.
6-26-4
Darderi L.
Olivo R.
6-26-4
Muller A.[6]
Nagal S.
4-66-16-3
Coria F.[1]
Torres J.
3-66-47-65
Varillas J.[2]
Olivieri G.
6-32-66-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-36-3
Cecchinato M.[3]
Paul J.
7-56-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Bertola R.
6-26-2
R32
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
6-737-657-65
Varillas J.[2]
Collarini A.
4-67-656-1
Olivieri G.
Navone M.
7-52-66-2
Choinski J.
Popko D.
6-33-66-3
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-1
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
4-66-16-1
Olivo R.
Elias G.
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Tirante T.
6-15-77-67
Cecchinato M.[3]
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Muller A.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Paz J.
7-656-0
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Comesana F.
6-06-1
Bertola R.
Giannessi A.
6-36-766-4