Li Tu vs James Duckworth — Seoul CH Semi-final

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
James Duckworth
AUS6
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Tu L.
6-4 6-3
Duckworth J.
Tu L.
662
Duckworth J.
430

Li Tu defeated James Duckworth 6-4 6-3 in the Seoul CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — James Duckworth came in ranked #74. Li Tu extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-07Cincinnati MastersQ1hardLi Tu7-6(4) 6-4
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersQ2hardLi Tu6-4 6-2
2025-01-06AdelaideR32hardLi Tu6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Duckworth J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tu L.Duckworth J.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Duckworth J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
55%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
7.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Duckworth J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
97
Break points won·Even
8
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
64
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Duckworth J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
6.4+121 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1628
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Duckworth J.
Freshness·
—
89

Duckworth J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tu L.
Wu Y.
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Wu Y.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-33-66-4
Tu L.
Duckworth J.[6]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[8]
Mochizuki S.
6-36-0
Wu Y.
Svrcina D.
6-26-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Marterer M.
4-67-666-3
Tu L.
Oconnell C.[5]
6-46-746-1
R16
Wu Y.
Stebe C.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Coppejans K.
6-36-4
Tu L.
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.[5]
Hijikata R.
6-46-1
Svrcina D.
Johnson S.[7]
6-23-66-1
Mochizuki S.
Neuchrist M.
6-42-66-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Chung H.
7-666-1
Majchrzak K.[8]
Millman J.
2-66-36-2
R32
Nakagawa N.
Popyrin A.[3]
3-67-57-66
Tu L.
Uchida K.
6-46-0
Majchrzak K.[8]
Clarke J.
6-26-2
Neuchrist M.
Polmans M.
3-66-36-4
Johnson S.[7]
Kim C.
6-36-2
Wu Y.
Albot R.[1]
6-04-66-2
Marterer M.
Tseng C.[2]
6-36-2
Millman J.
Moriya H.
6-36-1
Stebe C.
Vukic A.
7-56-766-4
Mochizuki S.
Gomez E.[4]
5-76-46-4
Hijikata R.
Kim J.
6-16-2
Oconnell C.[5]
Peniston R.
5-76-37-66
Svrcina D.
Eubanks C.
6-766-46-4
Chung H.
Piros Z.
4-66-33-0
Coppejans K.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Kovacevic A.
7-666-3