Michael Mmoh vs Gabriel Diallo — Fairfield CH Final

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Michael Mmoh
USA3
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
Gabriel Diallo
CAN
Gabriel Diallo
#93ATP
1716ELO
1678Hard ELO
$480kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
Mmoh M.
6-3 6-2
Diallo G.
Mmoh M.
662
Diallo G.
320

Michael Mmoh defeated Gabriel Diallo 6-3 6-2 in the Fairfield CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Gabriel Diallo came in ranked #93.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Diallo G.

Diallo G.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mmoh M.Diallo G.
—
Serve
38
—
Return
14

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Diallo G.
1st serve in·Even
65%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
8.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Diallo G.
Clutch Rating·Even
66
64
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
96
Break points won·Slight edge
31
24
Deciding sets·Even
90
87
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Diallo G.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1599
Surface ELO
6.1+79 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1716
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Diallo G.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
89

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Diallo G.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[3]
Diallo G.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[3]
Riffice S.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Riffice S.
Galarneau A.
6-47-63
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.[5]
7-667-5
Ayeni O.
Sandgren T.
6-47-67
Mmoh M.[3]
Shang J.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Diallo G.
Shelton B.[4]
5-77-656-3
Mmoh M.[3]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Oradini G.
6-756-46-0
Ayeni O.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Riffice S.
Langmo C.
6-756-36-4
Couacaud E.[5]
Perez A.
6-47-5
Shang J.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Zhu E.
6-16-4
R32
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
7-614-66-1
Galarneau A.
Krueger M.[8]
7-656-747-61
Riffice S.
Kozlov S.[2]
3-66-26-3
Langmo C.
Nanda G.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Jaziri M.
6-26-2
Oradini G.
Escobedo E.[6]
2-66-46-4
Holmgren A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-16-0
Ayeni O.
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-5
Cozbinov A.
Mejia N.
3-66-26-3
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
6-47-67
Shang J.[7]
Broom C.
7-54-66-3
Mmoh M.[3]
Jubb P.
6-20-0
Vacherot V.
Fearnley J.
7-627-65
Zhu E.
Lock B.
6-36-4
Diallo G.
Riedi L.
2-66-46-2
Shelton B.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-3