Brandon Nakashima vs Altug Celikbilek — Florence Round of 16

Florence · ATP · Round of 16
Brandon Nakashima
USA8
Brandon Nakashima
#31ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Nakashima B.
6-3 6-4
Celikbilek A.
Nakashima B.
662
Celikbilek A.
340

Brandon Nakashima defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-3 6-4 in the Florence round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Celikbilek A.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.5
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
40
Break points saved·Dominant
99
73
Break points won·Dominant
13
38
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Celikbilek A.
Freshness·
84
—

Nakashima B.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Wolf J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Musetti L.[3]
6-26-3
Wolf J.
Ymer M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Bublik A.[7]
3-67-56-1
Ymer M.
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-2
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Nakashima B.[8]
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Otte O.
6-46-726-2
Nakashima B.[8]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-4
Bublik A.[7]
Moutet C.
7-56-4
Wolf J.
Cressy M.[4]
6-36-4
Musetti L.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-0
Ymer M.
Karatsev A.[5]
6-16-766-1
Mcdonald M.
Passaro F.
6-47-5
Carballes Baena R.
Berrettini M.[2]
5-77-657-5
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Bublik A.[7]
Garin C.
7-56-2
Ymer M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Carballes Baena R.
Galan D.
6-26-1
Passaro F.
Zhang Z.
7-647-66
Karatsev A.[5]
Griekspoor T.
6-32-1
Nakashima B.[8]
Gasquet R.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Brooksby J.[6]
6-44-66-1
Moutet C.
Cobolli F.
4-67-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Maestrelli F.
4-66-26-1
Otte O.
Fucsovics M.
3-66-46-2