Anna Bondar vs Harriet Dart — Cluj Napoca Round of 16

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Round of 16
Anna Bondar
HUN8
Anna Bondar
#73WTA
1735ELO
1654Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2022
hard
Harriet Dart
GBR
Harriet Dart
#152WTA
1597ELO
1580Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLLW
Bondar A.
7-6 6-4
Dart H.
Bondar A.
7762
Dart H.
6340

Anna Bondar defeated Harriet Dart 7-6 6-4 in the Cluj Napoca round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #73. Anna Bondar claimed a first win over Harriet Dart in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05Cluj-NapocaR32hardHarriet Dart6-4 7-6(0)

Serve vs return

This season
Bondar A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Dart H.

Dart H.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bondar A.Dart H.
32
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bondar A.Dart H.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bondar A.Dart H.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
54
Break points saved·Dominant
88
37
Break points won·Slight edge
77
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
83
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
78
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bondar A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Dart H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+74 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1580
6.9Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1597
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
7.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bondar A.Dart H.
Freshness·Even
97
97

Bondar A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Dart H.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Blinkova A.
Paolini J.
6-23-66-2
Semi-finals
Paolini J.
Wang X.[7]
7-54-66-3
Blinkova A.
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-46-4
Quarter-finals
Wang X.[7]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-17-65
Blinkova A.
Kalinina A.[2]
6-776-16-3
Paolini J.
Niemeier J.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Bondar A.[8]
7-53-66-1
R16
Niemeier J.
Rakhimova K.
6-46-4
Kalinina A.[2]
Bonaventure Y.
6-36-2
Parrizas Diaz N.
Galfi D.
6-16-4
Wang X.[7]
Ruse E.
6-16-787-66
Paolini J.
Yastremska D.
6-46-1
Bondar A.[8]
Dart H.
7-636-4
Potapova A.[4]
Golubic V.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.
Wang X.
6-42-66-1
R32
Kalinina A.[2]
Bouchard E.
6-3
Yastremska D.
Korpatsch T.
6-34-67-5
Wang X.[7]
Cristian J.
6-36-3
Blinkova A.
Zakharova A.
6-17-67
Dart H.
Dodin O.
6-26-0
Galfi D.
Bronzetti L.[9]
4-66-26-4
Niemeier J.
Bogdan A.[3]
7-656-2
Rakhimova K.
Danilovic O.
6-26-4
Bonaventure Y.
Gracheva V.
7-57-5
Golubic V.
Parry D.
7-57-66
Potapova A.[4]
Li A.
6-27-65
Wang X.
Linette M.[5]
6-26-4
Paolini J.
Kostyuk M.[6]
5-76-36-4
Ruse E.
Tan H.
6-756-26-3
Parrizas Diaz N.
Bara I.
6-17-5
Bondar A.[8]
Avanesyan E.
6-46-2