Otto Virtanen vs Clement Tabur — Mouilleron Le Captif CH Round of 32

Mouilleron Le Captif CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Otto Virtanen
FIN
Otto Virtanen
#126ATP
1706ELO
1674Hard ELO
$214kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Virtanen O.
6-3 6-4
Tabur C.
Virtanen O.
662
Tabur C.
340

Otto Virtanen defeated Clement Tabur 6-3 6-4 in the Mouilleron Le Captif CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Otto Virtanen came in ranked #126.

Key context

  • Match story: Otto Virtanen closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Virtanen O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Virtanen O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Virtanen O.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.7
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Virtanen O.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
74
Break points won·Clear edge
3
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Virtanen O.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+102 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Hard Elo 1573
6.3Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Virtanen O.Tabur C.
Freshness·Dominant
80
55

Virtanen O.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Sels J.
Pospisil V.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.
Gaston H.[3]
6-33-66-3
Sels J.
Briand J.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.
Wolf J.[2]
4-66-37-63
Gaston H.[3]
Gombos N.[7]
6-46-4
Sels J.
Virtanen O.
6-36-4
Briand J.
Machac T.[8]
6-31-66-3
R16
Wolf J.[2]
Sock J.
7-616-4
Pospisil V.
Marie J.
6-36-3
Briand J.
Bourgue M.
5-76-46-3
Virtanen O.
De Schepper K.
6-26-4
Machac T.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-26-4
Gaston H.[3]
Royer V.
7-656-4
Gombos N.[7]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Sels J.
Lehecka J.[1]
7-684-2
R32
Royer V.
Furness E.
6-21-0
De Schepper K.
Simon G.
7-656-6
Sachko V.
Fils A.
7-57-5
Wolf J.[2]
Masur D.
6-37-5
Machac T.[8]
Vatutin A.
7-52-66-3
Virtanen O.
Tabur C.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Poljak D.
5-76-46-4
Lehecka J.[1]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-696-4
Pospisil V.
Grenier H.[6]
7-636-4
Briand J.
Gasquet R.[4]
6-27-5
Marie J.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-766-3
Gaston H.[3]
Laaksonen H.
7-664-67-67
Gombos N.[7]
Escoffier A.
2-66-16-2
Sock J.
Gautier A.
6-36-3
Bourgue M.
Bellier A.
6-726-46-3
Cazaux A.
Forejtek J.
7-616-4