Zachary Svajda vs Michael Mmoh — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zachary Svajda
USA
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA3
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Svajda Z.
6-3 5-7 7-6
Mmoh M.
Svajda Z.
65772
Mmoh M.
37641

Zachary Svajda defeated Michael Mmoh 6-3 5-7 7-6 in the Tiburon CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72.

Key context

  • Match story: Zachary Svajda closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Svajda Z.Mmoh M.
30
Serve
—
12
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Even
69
66
Break points saved·Even
89
91
Break points won·Dominant
66
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
90
Tiebreaks·Even
75
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+91 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1599
6.3Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1613
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
8.6
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
95

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.
Shelton B.[4]
2-66-26-4
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Shelton B.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
3-66-43-0
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
7-57-68
Galarneau A.
Jubb P.
6-36-736-4
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.[8]
6-36-4
Svajda Z.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-37-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Kozlov S.[2]
6-17-5
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[8]
Chappell N.
6-36-767-5
Couacaud E.[5]
Saville L.
4-66-06-3
Kudla D.[1]
Riedi L.
6-26-3
Shelton B.[4]
Riffice S.
6-36-2
Svajda Z.
Mmoh M.[3]
6-35-77-64
R32
Kudla D.[1]
Holt B.
6-42-1
Svajda Z.
Holmgren A.
4-66-37-65
Jubb P.
Nanda G.
7-54-66-3
Kozlov S.[2]
Oradini G.
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[6]
7-54-67-65
Krueger M.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Fanselow S.
7-54-66-3
Chappell N.
Mejia N.
7-643-66-1
Shelton B.[4]
Quiroz R.
3-66-27-64
Saville L.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Lock B.
6-16-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Riffice S.
King E.
6-767-56-1
Vacherot V.
Zhu E.
4-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Kypson P.
2-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Eriksson Ziverts J.
6-26-4