Moyuka Uchijima vs Petra Martic — Monastir Round of 16

Monastir · WTA · Round of 16
JPN
Moyuka Uchijima
#108WTA
1681ELO
1633Hard ELO
24 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
CRO4
Petra Martic
#1014WTA
1673ELO
1633Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Uchijima M.
7-5 7-6
Martic P.
Uchijima M.
7772
Martic P.
5650

Moyuka Uchijima defeated Petra Martic 7-5 7-6 in the Monastir round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Moyuka Uchijima came in ranked #108.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uchijima M.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Uchijima M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Uchijima M.Martic P.
0
Serve
—
8
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Uchijima M.Martic P.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
53%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchijima M.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Even
71
74
Break points saved·Clear edge
66
85
Break points won·Dominant
91
66
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
88
Tiebreaks·Even
88
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Uchijima M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Martic P.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+1 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Hard Elo 1633
5.8Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1673
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
7.5
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[5]
Cornet A.[3]
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Cornet A.[3]
Kudermetova V.[2]
6-46-3
Mertens E.[5]
Liu C.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Cornet A.[3]
Zidansek T.
7-57-67
Kudermetova V.[2]
Parry D.
6-46-1
Mertens E.[5]
Uchijima M.
6-03-66-4
Liu C.
Jabeur O.[1]
6-34-66-4
R16
Parry D.
Stefanini L.
6-31-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Rodina E.
6-16-3
Cornet A.[3]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Liu C.
Siniakova K.[7]
7-56-2
Mertens E.[5]
Papamichail D.
5-76-16-2
Zidansek T.
Potapova A.[6]
6-33-66-2
Kudermetova V.[2]
Frech M.
6-36-4
Uchijima M.
Martic P.[4]
7-57-65
R32
Siniakova K.[7]
Paquet C.
6-44-0
Rodina E.
Ruse E.
6-16-3
Kudermetova V.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-16-0
Cornet A.[3]
Pigossi L.
7-636-0
Zidansek T.
Bassols Ribera M.
5-76-37-5
Frech M.
Mansouri Y.
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[1]
Li A.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Konjuh A.
6-36-2
Martic P.[4]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-27-5
Uchijima M.
Rakhimova K.
6-36-3
Papamichail D.
Zhu L.
1-67-626-0
Mertens E.[5]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Dart H.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-4
Parry D.
Tan H.
6-42-66-1
Potapova A.[6]
Andreeva M.
6-36-746-3
Stefanini L.
Linette M.[8]
2-66-46-4