Frances Tiafoe vs Soon Woo Kwon — Tokyo Semi-final

Tokyo · ATP · Semi-final
Frances Tiafoe
USA4
Frances Tiafoe
#19ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
Soon Woo Kwon
KOR
Soon Woo Kwon
1744ELO
1716Hard ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Tiafoe F.
6-2 0-6 6-4
Kwon S.
Tiafoe F.
6062
Kwon S.
2641

Frances Tiafoe defeated Soon Woo Kwon 6-2 0-6 6-4 in the Tokyo semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Frances Tiafoe extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Frances Tiafoe closed it out in three sets, 6–2 0–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-24Tokyo OlympicsR64hardFrances Tiafoe6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kwon S.

Kwon S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Kwon S.
38
Serve
—
37
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Kwon S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Kwon S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
83
67
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
94
Break points won·Clear edge
57
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
77
Tiebreaks·Even
98
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tiafoe F.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kwon S.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+146 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1716
6.9Overall Elo 1918
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1744
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.6
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Kwon S.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
94

Tiafoe F.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Kwon S.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 64%
Final
Fritz T.[3]
Tiafoe F.[4]
7-637-62
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[4]
Kwon S.
6-20-66-4
Fritz T.[3]
Shapovalov D.[7]
6-36-756-3
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[4]
Kecmanovic M.
6-06-4
Shapovalov D.[7]
Coric B.[9]
6-46-3
Kwon S.
Martinez P.
6-36-0
Fritz T.[3]
Kyrgios N.[5]
W/O
R16
Martinez P.
Munar J.
4-66-36-1
Kwon S.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-746-2
Tiafoe F.[4]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-67
Kecmanovic M.
Evans D.[8]
6-33-67-64
Kyrgios N.[5]
Majchrzak K.
3-66-26-2
Fritz T.[3]
Moriya H.
6-13-66-4
Shapovalov D.[7]
Noguchi R.
6-36-1
Coric B.[9]
Nakashima B.
7-56-2
R32
Munar J.
Ruud C.[1]
6-36-3
Martinez P.
Popyrin A.
7-56-4
Mcdonald M.
Uchida K.
7-646-726-3
Kwon S.
De Minaur A.[6]
6-36-2
Tiafoe F.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Daniel T.
7-57-5
Kecmanovic M.
Nishioka Y.
2-67-616-2
Evans D.[8]
Albot R.
6-736-16-4
Kyrgios N.[5]
Tseng C.
6-36-1
Majchrzak K.
Shimabukuro S.
7-626-2
Shapovalov D.[7]
Johnson S.
6-37-63
Noguchi R.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-67-61
Nakashima B.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Coric B.[9]
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-64
Moriya H.
Shimizu Y.
6-16-3
Fritz T.[3]
Duckworth J.
6-26-726-1