Ons Jabeur vs Evgeniya Rodina — Monastir Round of 16

Monastir · WTA · Round of 16
TUN1
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
RUS
Evgeniya Rodina
37 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLW
Jabeur O.
6-1 6-3
Rodina E.
Jabeur O.
662
Rodina E.
130

Ons Jabeur defeated Evgeniya Rodina 6-1 6-3 in the Monastir round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ons Jabeur came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ons Jabeur extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-06-24EastbourneR64grassOns Jabeur1-6 7-6(3) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rodina E.

Rodina E.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Serve advantage — Jabeur O.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Rodina E.
1st serve in·Clear edge
57%
73%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
68%
54%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
51%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
50%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
0.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (176 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Rodina E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
24
Break points saved·Dominant
90
20
Break points won·Clear edge
96
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Rodina E.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1197 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
1.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[5]
Cornet A.[3]
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Cornet A.[3]
Kudermetova V.[2]
6-46-3
Mertens E.[5]
Liu C.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Cornet A.[3]
Zidansek T.
7-57-67
Kudermetova V.[2]
Parry D.
6-46-1
Mertens E.[5]
Uchijima M.
6-03-66-4
Liu C.
Jabeur O.[1]
6-34-66-4
R16
Parry D.
Stefanini L.
6-31-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Rodina E.
6-16-3
Cornet A.[3]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Liu C.
Siniakova K.[7]
7-56-2
Mertens E.[5]
Papamichail D.
5-76-16-2
Zidansek T.
Potapova A.[6]
6-33-66-2
Kudermetova V.[2]
Frech M.
6-36-4
Uchijima M.
Martic P.[4]
7-57-65
R32
Siniakova K.[7]
Paquet C.
6-44-0
Rodina E.
Ruse E.
6-16-3
Kudermetova V.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-16-0
Cornet A.[3]
Pigossi L.
7-636-0
Zidansek T.
Bassols Ribera M.
5-76-37-5
Frech M.
Mansouri Y.
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[1]
Li A.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Konjuh A.
6-36-2
Martic P.[4]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-27-5
Uchijima M.
Rakhimova K.
6-36-3
Papamichail D.
Zhu L.
1-67-626-0
Mertens E.[5]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Dart H.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-4
Parry D.
Tan H.
6-42-66-1
Potapova A.[6]
Andreeva M.
6-36-746-3
Stefanini L.
Linette M.[8]
2-66-46-4