Alexis Galarneau vs Paul Jubb — Tiburon CH Quarter-final

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Alexis Galarneau
CAN
Alexis Galarneau
#158ATP
1593ELO
1548Hard ELO
$166kYTD
$825kCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Galarneau A.
6-3 6-7 6-4
Jubb P.
Galarneau A.
66362
Jubb P.
37741

Alexis Galarneau defeated Paul Jubb 6-3 6-7 6-4 in the Tiburon CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galarneau A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Galarneau A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galarneau A.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galarneau A.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
84
Break points won·Slight edge
16
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
22
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galarneau A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+145 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1403
7.0Overall Elo 1593
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
6.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Galarneau A.Jubb P.
Freshness·Dominant
59
100

Galarneau A.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 113 games (7d) · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.
Shelton B.[4]
2-66-26-4
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Shelton B.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
3-66-43-0
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
7-57-68
Galarneau A.
Jubb P.
6-36-736-4
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.[8]
6-36-4
Svajda Z.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-37-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Kozlov S.[2]
6-17-5
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[8]
Chappell N.
6-36-767-5
Couacaud E.[5]
Saville L.
4-66-06-3
Kudla D.[1]
Riedi L.
6-26-3
Shelton B.[4]
Riffice S.
6-36-2
Svajda Z.
Mmoh M.[3]
6-35-77-64
R32
Kudla D.[1]
Holt B.
6-42-1
Svajda Z.
Holmgren A.
4-66-37-65
Jubb P.
Nanda G.
7-54-66-3
Kozlov S.[2]
Oradini G.
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[6]
7-54-67-65
Krueger M.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Fanselow S.
7-54-66-3
Chappell N.
Mejia N.
7-643-66-1
Shelton B.[4]
Quiroz R.
3-66-27-64
Saville L.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Lock B.
6-16-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Riffice S.
King E.
6-767-56-1
Vacherot V.
Zhu E.
4-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Kypson P.
2-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Eriksson Ziverts J.
6-26-4