Ernesto Escobedo vs Valentin Vacherot — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
MEX7
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1852Hard ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
Escobedo E.
6-2 6-4
Vacherot V.
Escobedo E.
662
Vacherot V.
240

Ernesto Escobedo defeated Valentin Vacherot 6-2 6-4 in the Tiburon CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Valentin Vacherot came in ranked #21.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escobedo E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Escobedo E.Vacherot V.
—
Serve
68
—
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Escobedo E.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escobedo E.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
96
Break points won·Clear edge
12
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escobedo E.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vacherot V.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
8.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.
Shelton B.[4]
2-66-26-4
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Shelton B.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
3-66-43-0
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
7-57-68
Galarneau A.
Jubb P.
6-36-736-4
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.[8]
6-36-4
Svajda Z.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-37-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Kozlov S.[2]
6-17-5
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[8]
Chappell N.
6-36-767-5
Couacaud E.[5]
Saville L.
4-66-06-3
Kudla D.[1]
Riedi L.
6-26-3
Shelton B.[4]
Riffice S.
6-36-2
Svajda Z.
Mmoh M.[3]
6-35-77-64
R32
Kudla D.[1]
Holt B.
6-42-1
Svajda Z.
Holmgren A.
4-66-37-65
Jubb P.
Nanda G.
7-54-66-3
Kozlov S.[2]
Oradini G.
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[6]
7-54-67-65
Krueger M.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Fanselow S.
7-54-66-3
Chappell N.
Mejia N.
7-643-66-1
Shelton B.[4]
Quiroz R.
3-66-27-64
Saville L.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Lock B.
6-16-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Riffice S.
King E.
6-767-56-1
Vacherot V.
Zhu E.
4-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Kypson P.
2-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Eriksson Ziverts J.
6-26-4