Enzo Couacaud vs Luke Saville — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA5
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
AUS
Luke Saville
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
Couacaud E.
4-6 6-0 6-3
Saville L.
Couacaud E.
4662
Saville L.
6031

Enzo Couacaud defeated Luke Saville 4-6 6-0 6-3 in the Tiburon CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Saville L.

Saville L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Serve advantage — Couacaud E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Saville L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Saville L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
19
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
69
Break points won·Clear edge
29
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
29
Tiebreaks·Even
29
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Saville L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.
Shelton B.[4]
2-66-26-4
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Shelton B.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
3-66-43-0
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
7-57-68
Galarneau A.
Jubb P.
6-36-736-4
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.[8]
6-36-4
Svajda Z.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-37-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Kozlov S.[2]
6-17-5
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[8]
Chappell N.
6-36-767-5
Couacaud E.[5]
Saville L.
4-66-06-3
Kudla D.[1]
Riedi L.
6-26-3
Shelton B.[4]
Riffice S.
6-36-2
Svajda Z.
Mmoh M.[3]
6-35-77-64
R32
Kudla D.[1]
Holt B.
6-42-1
Svajda Z.
Holmgren A.
4-66-37-65
Jubb P.
Nanda G.
7-54-66-3
Kozlov S.[2]
Oradini G.
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[6]
7-54-67-65
Krueger M.[8]
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Fanselow S.
7-54-66-3
Chappell N.
Mejia N.
7-643-66-1
Shelton B.[4]
Quiroz R.
3-66-27-64
Saville L.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Lock B.
6-16-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Broom C.
6-36-3
Riffice S.
King E.
6-767-56-1
Vacherot V.
Zhu E.
4-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Kypson P.
2-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Eriksson Ziverts J.
6-26-4