Alize Cornet vs Veronika Kudermetova — Monastir Semi-final

Monastir · WTA · Semi-final
FRA3
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
Veronika Kudermetova
RUS2
Veronika Kudermetova
#125WTA
1836ELO
1786Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWW
Cornet A.
6-4 6-3
Kudermetova V.
Cornet A.
662
Kudermetova V.
430

Alize Cornet defeated Veronika Kudermetova 6-4 6-3 in the Monastir semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Alize Cornet closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cornet A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kudermetova V.

Kudermetova V.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Serve advantage — Kudermetova V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cornet A.Kudermetova V.
—
Serve
67
—
Return
24

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cornet A.Kudermetova V.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
55%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
55%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cornet A.Kudermetova V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
85
Break points saved·Dominant
57
85
Break points won·Even
83
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
47
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cornet A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kudermetova V.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[5]
Cornet A.[3]
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Cornet A.[3]
Kudermetova V.[2]
6-46-3
Mertens E.[5]
Liu C.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Cornet A.[3]
Zidansek T.
7-57-67
Kudermetova V.[2]
Parry D.
6-46-1
Mertens E.[5]
Uchijima M.
6-03-66-4
Liu C.
Jabeur O.[1]
6-34-66-4
R16
Parry D.
Stefanini L.
6-31-0
Jabeur O.[1]
Rodina E.
6-16-3
Cornet A.[3]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Liu C.
Siniakova K.[7]
7-56-2
Mertens E.[5]
Papamichail D.
5-76-16-2
Zidansek T.
Potapova A.[6]
6-33-66-2
Kudermetova V.[2]
Frech M.
6-36-4
Uchijima M.
Martic P.[4]
7-57-65
R32
Siniakova K.[7]
Paquet C.
6-44-0
Rodina E.
Ruse E.
6-16-3
Kudermetova V.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-16-0
Cornet A.[3]
Pigossi L.
7-636-0
Zidansek T.
Bassols Ribera M.
5-76-37-5
Frech M.
Mansouri Y.
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[1]
Li A.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Konjuh A.
6-36-2
Martic P.[4]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-27-5
Uchijima M.
Rakhimova K.
6-36-3
Papamichail D.
Zhu L.
1-67-626-0
Mertens E.[5]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Dart H.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-4
Parry D.
Tan H.
6-42-66-1
Potapova A.[6]
Andreeva M.
6-36-746-3
Stefanini L.
Linette M.[8]
2-66-46-4