Simon Carr vs Nathan Ponwith — Tiburon CH Qualifying Round 1

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
IRL
Simon Carr
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2022
hard
USA9
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Carr S.
2-6 7-6 6-4
Ponwith N.
Carr S.
27762
Ponwith N.
66541

Simon Carr defeated Nathan Ponwith 2-6 7-6 6-4 in the Tiburon CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Carr S.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Carr S.

Serve advantage — Carr S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carr S.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Carr S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ponwith N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
King E.
Glinka D.
7-676-3
Michelsen A.
Carr S.
6-24-66-1
Saville L.
Young D.
6-36-4
Holmgren A.[12]
King D.
6-36-0
Chappell N.[2]
Perez A.[11]
6-37-5
Langmo C.[1]
Mayo A.[10]
6-756-36-2
Q1
Langmo C.[1]
Mayo K.
2-66-17-5
Michelsen A.
Brymer G.[6]
6-27-5
Perez A.[11]
Mora M.
7-57-5
Chappell N.[2]
Markes C.
6-16-3
King E.
Jaziri M.[3]
6-26-1
Glinka D.
Clark E.[7]
6-46-3
Saville L.
Damm M.[8]
7-653-66-2
Young D.
Kumar O.[5]
6-37-65
Carr S.
Ponwith N.[9]
2-67-656-4
Holmgren A.[12]
Farren C.
6-46-3
King D.
Sandgren T.[4]
7-56-2
Mayo A.[10]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-655-76-3