Simona Waltert vs Tamara Zidansek — Parma Round of 32

Parma · WTA · Round of 32
Simona Waltert
SUI
Simona Waltert
#81WTA
1670ELO
1654Clay ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
clay
Tamara Zidansek
SLO
Tamara Zidansek
#148WTA
1655ELO
1639Clay ELO
28 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLLLWLL
Waltert S.
6-4 6-4
Zidansek T.
Waltert S.
662
Zidansek T.
440

Simona Waltert defeated Tamara Zidansek 6-4 6-4 in the Parma round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Simona Waltert came in ranked #81.

Key context

  • Match story: Simona Waltert edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Waltert S.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Zidansek T.

Zidansek T.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Waltert S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Waltert S.Zidansek T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Even
1.9
1.4
Double faults / match·Even
4.0
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (180 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Waltert S.Zidansek T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
78
63
Break points saved·Dominant
79
39
Break points won·Even
94
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
85
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Waltert S.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Zidansek T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+16 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Clay Elo 1639
5.0Overall Elo 1670
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1655
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Waltert S.Zidansek T.
Freshness·Dominant
71
100

Waltert S.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Zidansek T.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.
Sakkari M.[1]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Sherif M.
Bogdan A.[6]
6-43-66-4
Sakkari M.[1]
Kovinic D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Sherif M.
Davis L.
7-626-3
Kovinic D.
Paolini J.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.[6]
Begu I.[3]
6-27-66
Sakkari M.[1]
Zanevska M.
2-66-46-4
R16
Paolini J.
Cocciaretto E.
4-66-36-4
Zanevska M.
Galfi D.
6-16-3
Sherif M.
Waltert S.
6-37-61
Bogdan A.[6]
Schmiedlova A.
6-23-66-3
Davis L.
Sorribes Tormo S.
3-66-47-5
Sakkari M.[1]
Rus A.
3-66-26-3
Kovinic D.
Stephens S.[4]
7-52-67-5
Begu I.[3]
Paoletti M.
6-46-4
R32
Begu I.[3]
Tomova V.
7-55-1
Sakkari M.[1]
Baindl K.
6-726-26-3
Schmiedlova A.
Jani R.
6-26-4
Paolini J.
Niemeier J.
5-76-46-2
Davis L.
Errani S.
7-57-5
Zanevska M.
Bronzetti L.[8]
6-36-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Trevisan M.[2]
7-56-0
Kovinic D.
Dodin O.
6-13-66-4
Bogdan A.[6]
Pigossi L.
6-16-2
Rus A.
Udvardy P.
7-56-3
Sherif M.
Bondar A.[5]
7-56-4
Paoletti M.
Lee G.
6-43-66-0
Stephens S.[4]
Frech M.
3-66-36-4
Galfi D.
Andreeva E.
6-16-2
Cocciaretto E.
Parrizas Diaz N.[7]
7-56-1
Waltert S.
Zidansek T.
6-46-4