Carlos Taberner vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Lisbon CH Round of 32

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP2
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
clay
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Taberner C.
6-4 6-4
Stebe C.
Taberner C.
662
Stebe C.
440

Carlos Taberner defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 6-4 6-4 in the Lisbon CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Even
53
51
Break points saved·Even
74
75
Break points won·Dominant
59
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Stebe C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+60 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Clay Elo 1545
5.7Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1556
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
7.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[4]
6-10-0
Cecchinato M.[5]
Skatov T.
7-57-62
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.
Muller A.[7]
6-47-5
Misolic F.[4]
Zeppieri G.
6-46-4
Skatov T.
Paire B.
6-42-67-5
Cecchinato M.[5]
Taberner C.[2]
7-626-4
R16
Paire B.
Moroni G.
6-44-3
Taberner C.[2]
Milojevic N.
6-06-767-65
Skatov T.
Passaro F.[3]
6-15-76-1
Muller A.[7]
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-3
Misolic F.[4]
Kopriva V.
2-66-26-3
Van Assche L.
Elias G.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.
Agamenone F.[6]
4-66-06-1
Cecchinato M.[5]
Mager G.
6-17-62
R32
Milojevic N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[5]
Michalski D.
6-16-2
Passaro F.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-43-66-1
Misolic F.[4]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-2
Muller A.[7]
Domingues J.
6-756-26-3
Van Assche L.
Bonadio R.
4-66-17-64
Mager G.
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Taberner C.[2]
Stebe C.
6-46-4
Zeppieri G.
Jahn J.
7-56-4
Paire B.
Oliveira G.
7-56-4
Agamenone F.[6]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-47-5
Elias G.
Cachin P.[1]
6-26-737-64
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.
6-14-66-3
Moroni G.
Guinard M.[8]
6-37-64
Kopriva V.
Sousa P.
4-66-46-1
Skatov T.
Roca Batalla O.
7-687-65