Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Joao Sousa — Tel Aviv Round of 32

Tel Aviv · ATP · Round of 32
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED5
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-2 6-3
Sousa J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Sousa J.
230

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Joao Sousa 6-2 6-3 in the Tel Aviv round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Sousa J.
41
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
35
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
91
Break points won·Dominant
68
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
48
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sousa J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
3.3
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Sousa J.
Freshness·
95
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Cilic M.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Cilic M.[2]
Lestienne C.
7-56-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-17-63
Quarter-finals
Cilic M.[2]
Broady L.
W/O
Safiullin R.
Rinderknech A.
6-46-1
Lestienne C.
Cressy M.[4]
6-746-37-63
Djokovic N.[1]
Pospisil V.
7-656-3
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Thiem D.
6-766-26-4
Pospisil V.
Leshem E.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Etcheverry T.
6-16-4
Cressy M.[4]
Korda S.
6-46-4
Broady L.
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
6-44-66-3
Lestienne C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.
Schwartzman D.[3]
6-32-67-67
Djokovic N.[1]
Andujar P.
6-06-3
R32
Etcheverry T.
Karatsev A.[6]
6-26-706-4
Pospisil V.
Griekspoor T.[8]
4-67-637-5
Safiullin R.
Grenier H.
3-66-46-2
Lestienne C.
Mannarino A.[7]
7-626-4
Thiem D.
Djere L.
5-77-636-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Wolf J.
6-36-2
Andujar P.
Monteiro T.
7-636-1
Broady L.
Medjedovic H.
7-56-3
Leshem E.
Oliel Y.
6-36-2
Korda S.
Ilkel C.
6-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Copil M.
6-756-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Sousa J.
6-26-3