Jack Sock vs Lukas Rosol — Orleans CH Round of 16

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA8
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Sock J.
6-3 6-3
Rosol L.
Sock J.
662
Rosol L.
330

Jack Sock defeated Lukas Rosol 6-3 6-3 in the Orleans CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jack Sock claimed a first win over Lukas Rosol in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-18Australian OpenR64hardLukas Rosol7-6(6) 7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Sock J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sock J.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sock J.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
67
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
89
Break points won·Dominant
28
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sock J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rosol L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.6
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.
Halys Q.[4]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Barrere G.
Gaston H.[2]
6-46-3
Halys Q.[4]
Andreev A.
7-626-4
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.
Gasquet R.[3]
1-66-36-4
Halys Q.[4]
Furness E.
6-33-66-2
Andreev A.
Gombos N.[6]
2-66-26-2
Gaston H.[2]
Sock J.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Gaston H.[2]
De Loore J.
3-66-36-1
Sock J.[8]
Rosol L.
6-36-3
Furness E.
Rodionov J.
7-673-67-63
Andreev A.
Moutet C.[1]
2-67-637-62
Gasquet R.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-46-4
Barrere G.
Fucsovics M.[5]
7-56-3
Gombos N.[6]
Fils A.
7-646-1
Halys Q.[4]
Brouwer G.
6-31-0
R32
Gasquet R.[3]
De Jong J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Escoffier A.
6-37-63
Sock J.[8]
Mayot H.
3-66-36-2
Lokoli L.
Virtanen O.
7-636-3
Brouwer G.
Forejtek J.
6-45-77-611
Halys Q.[4]
Fatic N.
6-736-26-2
Gombos N.[6]
Blanch U.
7-644-66-4
Fils A.
Mansouri S.
6-46-2
Andreev A.
Ramanathan R.
6-41-66-2
Rodionov J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-736-37-5
Gaston H.[2]
Masur D.
6-02-66-2
Furness E.
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-26-0
Fucsovics M.[5]
Bellier A.
6-47-64
Barrere G.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Rosol L.
Janvier M.
4-2
Moutet C.[1]
Geerts M.
7-637-63