Holger Rune vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Sofia Round of 32

Sofia · ATP · Round of 32
Holger Rune
DEN5
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Rune H.
7-6 7-6
Van Rijthoven T.
Rune H.
77782
Van Rijthoven T.
62660

Holger Rune defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 7-6 7-6 in the Sofia round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rune H.Van Rijthoven T.
47
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
69%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
90
Break points won·Dominant
84
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Van Rijthoven T.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.
Rune H.[5]
6-47-68
Semi-finals
Huesler M.
Musetti L.[4]
7-657-5
Rune H.[5]
Sinner J.[1]
5-76-45-2
Quarter-finals
Sinner J.[1]
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Rune H.[5]
Ivashka I.
6-25-76-4
Huesler M.
Majchrzak K.
6-747-666-3
Musetti L.[4]
Struff J.
7-636-1
R16
Huesler M.
Carreno Busta P.[2]
6-33-66-2
Sinner J.[1]
Borges N.
6-36-4
Vukic A.
Verdasco F.
1-66-46-3
Ivashka I.
Dimitrov G.[3]
6-37-63
Rune H.[5]
Sonego L.
6-716-46-3
Musetti L.[4]
Lazarov A.
6-757-686-2
Majchrzak K.
Otte O.[8]
4-66-26-4
Struff J.
Humbert U.
6-36-1
R32
Otte O.[8]
Madaras D.
6-36-2
Verdasco F.
Basilashvili N.[6]
7-617-5
Sonego L.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4
Struff J.
Lajovic D.
4-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Berankis R.
7-56-2
Huesler M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Rune H.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-627-66
Humbert U.
Kuzmanov D.
7-646-4
Lazarov A.
Lehecka J.
7-56-3
Vukic A.
Fognini F.
7-6117-5
Borges N.
Basic M.
3-66-36-2
Ivashka I.
Ymer M.
7-684-67-5