Filip Misolic vs Giulio Zeppieri — Lisbon CH Quarter-final

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Filip Misolic
AUT4
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
clay
Giulio Zeppieri
ITA
Giulio Zeppieri
#218ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
Misolic F.
6-4 6-4
Zeppieri G.
Misolic F.
662
Zeppieri G.
440

Filip Misolic defeated Giulio Zeppieri 6-4 6-4 in the Lisbon CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zeppieri G.

Zeppieri G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Zeppieri G.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Zeppieri G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
79
55
Break points saved·Even
91
95
Break points won·Clear edge
53
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Zeppieri G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+98 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1566
4.6Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1622
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[4]
6-10-0
Cecchinato M.[5]
Skatov T.
7-57-62
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.
Muller A.[7]
6-47-5
Misolic F.[4]
Zeppieri G.
6-46-4
Skatov T.
Paire B.
6-42-67-5
Cecchinato M.[5]
Taberner C.[2]
7-626-4
R16
Paire B.
Moroni G.
6-44-3
Taberner C.[2]
Milojevic N.
6-06-767-65
Skatov T.
Passaro F.[3]
6-15-76-1
Muller A.[7]
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-3
Misolic F.[4]
Kopriva V.
2-66-26-3
Van Assche L.
Elias G.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.
Agamenone F.[6]
4-66-06-1
Cecchinato M.[5]
Mager G.
6-17-62
R32
Milojevic N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[5]
Michalski D.
6-16-2
Passaro F.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-43-66-1
Misolic F.[4]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-2
Muller A.[7]
Domingues J.
6-756-26-3
Van Assche L.
Bonadio R.
4-66-17-64
Mager G.
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Taberner C.[2]
Stebe C.
6-46-4
Zeppieri G.
Jahn J.
7-56-4
Paire B.
Oliveira G.
7-56-4
Agamenone F.[6]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-47-5
Elias G.
Cachin P.[1]
6-26-737-64
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.
6-14-66-3
Moroni G.
Guinard M.[8]
6-37-64
Kopriva V.
Sousa P.
4-66-46-1
Skatov T.
Roca Batalla O.
7-687-65