Quentin Halys vs Nerman Fatic — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA4
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1417Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Halys Q.
6-7 6-2 6-2
Fatic N.
Halys Q.
63662
Fatic N.
77221

Quentin Halys defeated Nerman Fatic 6-7 6-2 6-2 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Fatic N.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
24
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Dominant
4
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+260 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1417
7.4Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.0
Win streak
10.08-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
4.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Fatic N.
Freshness·
93
—

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.
Halys Q.[4]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Barrere G.
Gaston H.[2]
6-46-3
Halys Q.[4]
Andreev A.
7-626-4
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.
Gasquet R.[3]
1-66-36-4
Halys Q.[4]
Furness E.
6-33-66-2
Andreev A.
Gombos N.[6]
2-66-26-2
Gaston H.[2]
Sock J.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Gaston H.[2]
De Loore J.
3-66-36-1
Sock J.[8]
Rosol L.
6-36-3
Furness E.
Rodionov J.
7-673-67-63
Andreev A.
Moutet C.[1]
2-67-637-62
Gasquet R.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-46-4
Barrere G.
Fucsovics M.[5]
7-56-3
Gombos N.[6]
Fils A.
7-646-1
Halys Q.[4]
Brouwer G.
6-31-0
R32
Gasquet R.[3]
De Jong J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Escoffier A.
6-37-63
Sock J.[8]
Mayot H.
3-66-36-2
Lokoli L.
Virtanen O.
7-636-3
Brouwer G.
Forejtek J.
6-45-77-611
Halys Q.[4]
Fatic N.
6-736-26-2
Gombos N.[6]
Blanch U.
7-644-66-4
Fils A.
Mansouri S.
6-46-2
Andreev A.
Ramanathan R.
6-41-66-2
Rodionov J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-736-37-5
Gaston H.[2]
Masur D.
6-02-66-2
Furness E.
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-26-0
Fucsovics M.[5]
Bellier A.
6-47-64
Barrere G.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Rosol L.
Janvier M.
4-2
Moutet C.[1]
Geerts M.
7-637-63