Mayar Sherif vs Lauren Davis — Parma Quarter-final

Parma · WTA · Quarter-final
Mayar Sherif
EGY
Mayar Sherif
#97WTA
1685ELO
1663Clay ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
clay
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Sherif M.
7-6 6-3
Davis L.
Sherif M.
7762
Davis L.
6230

Mayar Sherif defeated Lauren Davis 7-6 6-3 in the Parma quarter-final on clay. Mayar Sherif extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Mayar Sherif closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-22MadridR128clayMayar Sherif4-6 7-6(4) 6-4
2021-03-15MonterreyR32hardLauren Davis1-6 6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Sherif M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Sherif M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sherif M.Davis L.
1st serve in·Clear edge
73%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sherif M.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
67
51
Break points saved·Dominant
84
26
Break points won·Even
81
79
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sherif M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Davis L.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
2.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sherif M.Davis L.
Freshness·
52
—

Sherif M.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 115 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.
Sakkari M.[1]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Sherif M.
Bogdan A.[6]
6-43-66-4
Sakkari M.[1]
Kovinic D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Sherif M.
Davis L.
7-626-3
Kovinic D.
Paolini J.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.[6]
Begu I.[3]
6-27-66
Sakkari M.[1]
Zanevska M.
2-66-46-4
R16
Paolini J.
Cocciaretto E.
4-66-36-4
Zanevska M.
Galfi D.
6-16-3
Sherif M.
Waltert S.
6-37-61
Bogdan A.[6]
Schmiedlova A.
6-23-66-3
Davis L.
Sorribes Tormo S.
3-66-47-5
Sakkari M.[1]
Rus A.
3-66-26-3
Kovinic D.
Stephens S.[4]
7-52-67-5
Begu I.[3]
Paoletti M.
6-46-4
R32
Begu I.[3]
Tomova V.
7-55-1
Sakkari M.[1]
Baindl K.
6-726-26-3
Schmiedlova A.
Jani R.
6-26-4
Paolini J.
Niemeier J.
5-76-46-2
Davis L.
Errani S.
7-57-5
Zanevska M.
Bronzetti L.[8]
6-36-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Trevisan M.[2]
7-56-0
Kovinic D.
Dodin O.
6-13-66-4
Bogdan A.[6]
Pigossi L.
6-16-2
Rus A.
Udvardy P.
7-56-3
Sherif M.
Bondar A.[5]
7-56-4
Paoletti M.
Lee G.
6-43-66-0
Stephens S.[4]
Frech M.
3-66-36-4
Galfi D.
Andreeva E.
6-16-2
Cocciaretto E.
Parrizas Diaz N.[7]
7-56-1
Waltert S.
Zidansek T.
6-46-4