Lauren Davis vs Sara Errani — Parma Round of 32

Parma · WTA · Round of 32
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
clay
ITA
Sara Errani
39 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLL
Davis L.
7-5 7-5
Errani S.
Davis L.
772
Errani S.
550

Lauren Davis defeated Sara Errani 7-5 7-5 in the Parma round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sara Errani came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's quarter-final. Lauren Davis narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-04-18Fed Cup WG PO: ITA vs USARRclaySara Errani6-1 6-2
2015-03-02MonterreyR32hardSara Errani6-0 6-3
2014-06-16EastbourneR32grassLauren Davis7-6(5) 6-2
2014-01-06SydneyR16hardSara Errani7-5 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Davis L.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Errani S.

Errani S.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Davis L.Errani S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
78%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
42%
Service points won·Even
55%
52%
Return points won·Even
44%
47%
Break points saved·Even
51%
48%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
0.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Davis L.Errani S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
26
8
Break points won·Clear edge
79
98
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Davis L.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Errani S.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.
Sakkari M.[1]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Sherif M.
Bogdan A.[6]
6-43-66-4
Sakkari M.[1]
Kovinic D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Sherif M.
Davis L.
7-626-3
Kovinic D.
Paolini J.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.[6]
Begu I.[3]
6-27-66
Sakkari M.[1]
Zanevska M.
2-66-46-4
R16
Paolini J.
Cocciaretto E.
4-66-36-4
Zanevska M.
Galfi D.
6-16-3
Sherif M.
Waltert S.
6-37-61
Bogdan A.[6]
Schmiedlova A.
6-23-66-3
Davis L.
Sorribes Tormo S.
3-66-47-5
Sakkari M.[1]
Rus A.
3-66-26-3
Kovinic D.
Stephens S.[4]
7-52-67-5
Begu I.[3]
Paoletti M.
6-46-4
R32
Begu I.[3]
Tomova V.
7-55-1
Sakkari M.[1]
Baindl K.
6-726-26-3
Schmiedlova A.
Jani R.
6-26-4
Paolini J.
Niemeier J.
5-76-46-2
Davis L.
Errani S.
7-57-5
Zanevska M.
Bronzetti L.[8]
6-36-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Trevisan M.[2]
7-56-0
Kovinic D.
Dodin O.
6-13-66-4
Bogdan A.[6]
Pigossi L.
6-16-2
Rus A.
Udvardy P.
7-56-3
Sherif M.
Bondar A.[5]
7-56-4
Paoletti M.
Lee G.
6-43-66-0
Stephens S.[4]
Frech M.
3-66-36-4
Galfi D.
Andreeva E.
6-16-2
Cocciaretto E.
Parrizas Diaz N.[7]
7-56-1
Waltert S.
Zidansek T.
6-46-4