Ezekiel Clark vs Colin Markes — Charleston CH Qualifying Round 1

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA10
Ezekiel Clark
#1280ATP
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
USA
Colin Markes
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
Clark E.
3-6 6-2 6-2
Markes C.
Clark E.
3662
Markes C.
6221

Ezekiel Clark defeated Colin Markes 3-6 6-2 6-2 in the Charleston CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Clark E.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Markes C.

Markes C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Clark E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clark E.Markes C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
55%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clark E.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Markes C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.9
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Oradini G.[2]
Brymer G.[8]
5-77-56-2
Kypson P.
Kumar O.[7]
6-36-3
Young D.
Clark E.[10]
7-647-67
Holmgren A.
Cassone M.
7-647-62
Johns G.
Sandgren T.[3]
3-66-36-2
Kirchheimer S.[12]
Nanda G.[1]
6-16-1
Q1
Holmgren A.
Nakagawa N.[11]
4-67-636-2
Sandgren T.[3]
Ponwith N.
4-66-36-4
Cassone M.
Jaziri M.[4]
6-36-2
Clark E.[10]
Markes C.
3-66-26-2
Kumar O.[7]
Ayeni O.
6-36-1
Kypson P.
Chappell N.[6]
4-66-26-0
Young D.
Langmo C.[5]
7-56-0
Johns G.
Damm M.[9]
6-44-66-3
Brymer G.[8]
Martin A.
3-66-46-1
Oradini G.[2]
Mayo A.
4-66-16-4
Nanda G.[1]
Harrison R.
7-52-2