Gastao Elias vs Pedro Cachin — Lisbon CH Round of 32

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
clay
ARG1
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Elias G.
6-2 6-7 7-6
Cachin P.
Elias G.
663772
Cachin P.
277641

Gastao Elias defeated Pedro Cachin 6-2 6-7 7-6 in the Lisbon CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Gastao Elias closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Elias G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Cachin P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Elias G.Cachin P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (172 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Elias G.Cachin P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
22
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
77
Break points won·Even
24
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Elias G.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cachin P.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
9.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[4]
6-10-0
Cecchinato M.[5]
Skatov T.
7-57-62
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.
Muller A.[7]
6-47-5
Misolic F.[4]
Zeppieri G.
6-46-4
Skatov T.
Paire B.
6-42-67-5
Cecchinato M.[5]
Taberner C.[2]
7-626-4
R16
Paire B.
Moroni G.
6-44-3
Taberner C.[2]
Milojevic N.
6-06-767-65
Skatov T.
Passaro F.[3]
6-15-76-1
Muller A.[7]
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-3
Misolic F.[4]
Kopriva V.
2-66-26-3
Van Assche L.
Elias G.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.
Agamenone F.[6]
4-66-06-1
Cecchinato M.[5]
Mager G.
6-17-62
R32
Milojevic N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[5]
Michalski D.
6-16-2
Passaro F.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-43-66-1
Misolic F.[4]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-2
Muller A.[7]
Domingues J.
6-756-26-3
Van Assche L.
Bonadio R.
4-66-17-64
Mager G.
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Taberner C.[2]
Stebe C.
6-46-4
Zeppieri G.
Jahn J.
7-56-4
Paire B.
Oliveira G.
7-56-4
Agamenone F.[6]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-47-5
Elias G.
Cachin P.[1]
6-26-737-64
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.
6-14-66-3
Moroni G.
Guinard M.[8]
6-37-64
Kopriva V.
Sousa P.
4-66-46-1
Skatov T.
Roca Batalla O.
7-687-65