Liam Broady vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Tel Aviv Round of 16

Tel Aviv · ATP · Round of 16
Liam Broady
GBR
Liam Broady
#198ATP
1590ELO
1577Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED5
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Broady L.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Broady L.
6462
Van De Zandschulp B.
4631

Liam Broady defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Tel Aviv round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55. Liam Broady extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Liam Broady closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonR128grassBotic Van De Zandschulp6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2
2020-09-28Roland GarrosQ2clayLiam Broady7-6(5) 7-6(8)

Serve vs return

This season
Broady L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Broady L.

Serve advantage — Broady L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Broady L.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Broady L.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broady L.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
77
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
98
Break points won·Dominant
29
68
Deciding sets·Even
80
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broady L.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Van De Zandschulp B.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1577
Surface ELO
6.6+133 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1590
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
7.9
0.0
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broady L.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Dominant
52
95

Broady L.: played today · 4 matches, 101 games (7d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Cilic M.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Cilic M.[2]
Lestienne C.
7-56-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-17-63
Quarter-finals
Cilic M.[2]
Broady L.
W/O
Safiullin R.
Rinderknech A.
6-46-1
Lestienne C.
Cressy M.[4]
6-746-37-63
Djokovic N.[1]
Pospisil V.
7-656-3
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Thiem D.
6-766-26-4
Pospisil V.
Leshem E.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Etcheverry T.
6-16-4
Cressy M.[4]
Korda S.
6-46-4
Broady L.
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
6-44-66-3
Lestienne C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.
Schwartzman D.[3]
6-32-67-67
Djokovic N.[1]
Andujar P.
6-06-3
R32
Etcheverry T.
Karatsev A.[6]
6-26-706-4
Pospisil V.
Griekspoor T.[8]
4-67-637-5
Safiullin R.
Grenier H.
3-66-46-2
Lestienne C.
Mannarino A.[7]
7-626-4
Thiem D.
Djere L.
5-77-636-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Wolf J.
6-36-2
Andujar P.
Monteiro T.
7-636-1
Broady L.
Medjedovic H.
7-56-3
Leshem E.
Oliel Y.
6-36-2
Korda S.
Ilkel C.
6-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Copil M.
6-756-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[5]
Sousa J.
6-26-3