Ulises Blanch vs Arthur Cazaux — Orleans CH Qualifying Round 2

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2022
hard
Arthur Cazaux
FRA3
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Blanch U.
7-5 3-6 6-4
Cazaux A.
Blanch U.
7362
Cazaux A.
5641

Ulises Blanch defeated Arthur Cazaux 7-5 3-6 6-4 in the Orleans CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Cazaux A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Blanch U.Cazaux A.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Cazaux A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Cazaux A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
65
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
97
Break points won·Dominant
2
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Cazaux A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
8.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Blanch U.
Cazaux A.[3]
7-53-66-4
Rosenkranz M.
Blanchet U.[6]
6-36-2
Rosol L.[1]
Atmane T.
7-656-4
Fils A.[9]
Tabur C.[5]
6-37-63
Janvier M.[4]
De Schepper K.[12]
6-25-77-64
De Loore J.[8]
Sachko V.[2]
6-37-5
Q1
Cazaux A.[3]
Brosset S.
6-24-66-2
Rosol L.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-37-5
De Loore J.[8]
Hoang A.
7-647-5
Blanch U.
Neuchrist M.[10]
6-7117-647-67
De Schepper K.[12]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-36-756-3
Rosenkranz M.
Durasovic V.[7]
7-626-746-4
Blanchet U.[6]
Jacquet K.
7-602-66-3
Fils A.[9]
Molleker R.
4-67-657-5
Tabur C.[5]
Bobrov B.
7-646-3
Janvier M.[4]
Poullain L.
6-36-4
Sachko V.[2]
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Atmane T.
Yunchaokete B.[11]
6-46-4