Johan Nikles vs Kai Wehnelt — Sibiu CH Round of 32

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
Kai Wehnelt
GER
Kai Wehnelt
#615ATP
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
Nikles J.
6-4 7-5
Wehnelt K.
Nikles J.
672
Wehnelt K.
450

Johan Nikles defeated Kai Wehnelt 6-4 7-5 in the Sibiu CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nikles J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Wehnelt K.

Wehnelt K.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nikles J.Wehnelt K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
59%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
38%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nikles J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wehnelt K.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nikles J.Wehnelt K.
Freshness·
—
84

Wehnelt K.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ionel N.
0-67-666-3
Fatic N.
Coria F.[1]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3