Dominic Stricker vs Patrick Kypson — Columbus CH Round of 32

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dominic Stricker
SUI3
Dominic Stricker
#360ATP
1533ELO
1509Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Stricker D.
6-2 6-4
Kypson P.
Stricker D.
662
Kypson P.
240

Dominic Stricker defeated Patrick Kypson 6-2 6-4 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stricker D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Stricker D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stricker D.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.7
7.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stricker D.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
42
Break points saved·Even
92
93
Break points won·Dominant
9
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
17
Tiebreaks·Even
74
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stricker D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kypson P.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1509
Surface ELO
6.1+103 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1533
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1641
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Stricker D.Kypson P.
Freshness·Slight edge
88
94

Stricker D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[3]
Stricker D.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[1]
Gomez E.[2]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-36-4
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-42-66-4
Thompson J.[1]
Kingsley C.
7-666-3
Gomez E.[2]
Hijikata R.[8]
3-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Gomez E.[6]
6-14-66-3
Brooksby J.[1]
Escobedo E.[5]
6-41-66-1
Stricker D.
Sock J.[7]
W/O
Rodionov J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-717-54-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Stricker D.[3]
4-67-676-3
Kingsley C.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Diallo G.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
R16
Nishioka Y.[3]
Wolf J.
6-22-66-4
Stricker D.
Kozlov S.
4-66-46-3
Torpegaard M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-16-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Blanch U.
7-686-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Istomin D.
7-56-1
Sock J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Gomez E.[6]
Kuhn N.
7-667-5
Gomez E.[2]
Sandgren T.
3-66-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Lock B.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[8]
Boulais J.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Jubb P.[7]
7-646-4
Diallo G.
Mchugh A.
7-56-767-5
Thompson J.[1]
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Chappell N.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-716-4
Vukic A.[4]
Nakagawa N.
7-53-67-62
R32
Kozlov S.
Bernard A.
6-26-1
Soeda G.
Wu T.
7-656-2
Rodionov J.[4]
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Hardt N.
Harrison R.
6-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
6-47-63
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-2
Gomez E.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-5
Kuhn N.
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
7-676-4
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.
7-51-66-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Krueger M.
2-66-37-5
Wolf J.
Anthrop J.
6-06-3
Sock J.[7]
Eubanks C.
7-676-746-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Stricker D.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-737-60
Gomez E.[2]
Cash R.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Galarneau A.
1-66-16-3
Stricker D.[3]
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Tracy J.
7-57-64
Hijikata R.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-16-4
Jubb P.[7]
Harrison R.
7-666-4
Nakagawa N.
Clark E.
7-56-2
Diallo G.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Lock B.
Zhu E.
3-66-17-67
Sandgren T.
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Vukic A.[4]
Cox D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Broom C.
7-656-2
Mchugh A.
Koepfer D.[6]
3-67-647-67