Denis Kudla vs Fernando Verdasco — San Diego Round of 32

San Diego · ATP · Round of 32
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
ESP
Fernando Verdasco
42 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Kudla D.
6-3 6-3
Verdasco F.
Kudla D.
662
Verdasco F.
330

Denis Kudla defeated Fernando Verdasco 6-3 6-3 in the San Diego round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in defending last year's round of 32. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-04-09HoustonR32clayDenis Kudla6-4 7-6(4)
2015-10-19StockholmR32hardFernando Verdasco6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Verdasco F.

Verdasco F.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Verdasco F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Verdasco F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
50
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
96
Break points won·Clear edge
19
40
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
65
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
30
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Verdasco F.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
5.2
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[5]
Giron M.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Giron M.[3]
Evans D.[1]
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Evans D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Galan D.
6-34-66-4
Oconnell C.
Brooksby J.[2]
6-44-67-5
Giron M.[3]
Duckworth J.[7]
7-656-3
R16
Evans D.[1]
Daniel T.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[5]
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Galan D.
Martinez P.[4]
5-76-16-4
Brooksby J.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-43-66-2
Lestienne C.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-16-3
Giron M.[3]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Krueger M.
6-37-64
Oconnell C.
Wolf J.[8]
6-37-5
R32
Oconnell C.
Kubler J.
4-66-30-0
Lestienne C.
Holt B.
5-77-656-3
Etcheverry T.
Mena F.
7-666-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-54-66-1
Kudla D.
Verdasco F.
6-36-3
Galan D.
Huesler M.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Svajda Z.
7-57-65
Mcdonald M.
Laaksonen H.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Nava E.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Wolf J.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-27-66
Tabilo A.[6]
Johnson S.
7-56-2