Christopher Oconnell vs Jason Kubler — San Diego Round of 32

San Diego · ATP · Round of 32
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Oconnell C.
4-6 6-3 0-0
Kubler J.
Oconnell C.
460–
Kubler J.
630–

Christopher Oconnell advanced when Jason Kubler retired 4-6 6-3 0-0 in the San Diego round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Kubler J.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.1
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
90
Break points won·Clear edge
22
46
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Kubler J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+22 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 1635
4.7Overall Elo 1673
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[5]
Giron M.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Giron M.[3]
Evans D.[1]
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Evans D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Galan D.
6-34-66-4
Oconnell C.
Brooksby J.[2]
6-44-67-5
Giron M.[3]
Duckworth J.[7]
7-656-3
R16
Evans D.[1]
Daniel T.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[5]
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Galan D.
Martinez P.[4]
5-76-16-4
Brooksby J.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-43-66-2
Lestienne C.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-16-3
Giron M.[3]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Krueger M.
6-37-64
Oconnell C.
Wolf J.[8]
6-37-5
R32
Oconnell C.
Kubler J.
4-66-30-0
Lestienne C.
Holt B.
5-77-656-3
Etcheverry T.
Mena F.
7-666-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-54-66-1
Kudla D.
Verdasco F.
6-36-3
Galan D.
Huesler M.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Svajda Z.
7-57-65
Mcdonald M.
Laaksonen H.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Nava E.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Wolf J.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-27-66
Tabilo A.[6]
Johnson S.
7-56-2