Cannon Kingsley vs Aleksandar Vukic — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
Aleksandar Vukic
AUS4
Aleksandar Vukic
#113ATP
1630ELO
1597Hard ELO
$366kYTD
$3.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWWLWWL
Kingsley C.
6-3 6-2
Vukic A.
Kingsley C.
662
Vukic A.
320

Cannon Kingsley defeated Aleksandar Vukic 6-3 6-2 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Aleksandar Vukic came in ranked #113, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Vukic A.

Vukic A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kingsley C.Vukic A.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
5

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Vukic A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
8.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kingsley C.Vukic A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
97
Break points won·Even
19
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Vukic A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.0Hard Elo 1345
Surface ELO
8.0+253 Hard Elo edge
1.7Overall Elo 1342
ELO gap
8.3Overall Elo 1630
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kingsley C.Vukic A.
Freshness·
—
65

Vukic A.: played today · 2 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[3]
Stricker D.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[1]
Gomez E.[2]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-36-4
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-42-66-4
Thompson J.[1]
Kingsley C.
7-666-3
Gomez E.[2]
Hijikata R.[8]
3-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Gomez E.[6]
6-14-66-3
Brooksby J.[1]
Escobedo E.[5]
6-41-66-1
Stricker D.
Sock J.[7]
W/O
Rodionov J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-717-54-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Stricker D.[3]
4-67-676-3
Kingsley C.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Diallo G.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
R16
Nishioka Y.[3]
Wolf J.
6-22-66-4
Stricker D.
Kozlov S.
4-66-46-3
Torpegaard M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-16-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Blanch U.
7-686-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Istomin D.
7-56-1
Sock J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Gomez E.[6]
Kuhn N.
7-667-5
Gomez E.[2]
Sandgren T.
3-66-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Lock B.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[8]
Boulais J.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Jubb P.[7]
7-646-4
Diallo G.
Mchugh A.
7-56-767-5
Thompson J.[1]
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Chappell N.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-716-4
Vukic A.[4]
Nakagawa N.
7-53-67-62
R32
Kozlov S.
Bernard A.
6-26-1
Soeda G.
Wu T.
7-656-2
Rodionov J.[4]
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Hardt N.
Harrison R.
6-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
6-47-63
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-2
Gomez E.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-5
Kuhn N.
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
7-676-4
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.
7-51-66-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Krueger M.
2-66-37-5
Wolf J.
Anthrop J.
6-06-3
Sock J.[7]
Eubanks C.
7-676-746-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Stricker D.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-737-60
Gomez E.[2]
Cash R.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Galarneau A.
1-66-16-3
Stricker D.[3]
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Tracy J.
7-57-64
Hijikata R.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-16-4
Jubb P.[7]
Harrison R.
7-666-4
Nakagawa N.
Clark E.
7-56-2
Diallo G.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Lock B.
Zhu E.
3-66-17-67
Sandgren T.
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Vukic A.[4]
Cox D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Broom C.
7-656-2
Mchugh A.
Koepfer D.[6]
3-67-647-67