Lin Zhu vs Su Jeong Jang — Seoul Round of 32

Seoul · WTA · Round of 32
Lin Zhu
CHN4
Lin Zhu
#130WTA
1674ELO
1647Hard ELO
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
KOR
Su Jeong Jang
#657WTA
1384ELO
1355Hard ELO
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
Zhu L.
6-3 6-4
Jang S.
Zhu L.
662
Jang S.
340

Lin Zhu defeated Su Jeong Jang 6-3 6-4 in the Seoul round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lin Zhu came in ranked #130, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lin Zhu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Lin Zhu closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-30Hua HinR16hardLin Zhu6-4 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Zhu L.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jang S.

Jang S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zhu L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Zhu L.Jang S.
14
Serve
—
60
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zhu L.Jang S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Even
1.8
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhu L.Jang S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
13
Break points saved·Dominant
64
35
Break points won·Clear edge
91
76
Deciding sets·Even
15
14
Tiebreaks·
65
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhu L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Jang S.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 157 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.6+293 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Hard Elo 1355
8.6Overall Elo 1674
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1384
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zhu L.Jang S.
Freshness·
100
—

Zhu L.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Alexandrova E.[2]
Ostapenko J.[1]
7-646-0
Semi-finals
Ostapenko J.[1]
Raducanu E.[6]
4-66-33-0
Alexandrova E.[2]
Maria T.[7]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Ostapenko J.[1]
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-26-1
Raducanu E.[6]
Linette M.[3]
6-26-2
Maria T.[7]
Zhu L.[4]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.[2]
Sun L.
7-57-66
R16
Ostapenko J.[1]
Gasanova A.
6-35-77-5
Alexandrova E.[2]
Han N.
6-16-3
Maria T.[7]
Birrell K.
6-06-3
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Marino R.[8]
6-46-2
Raducanu E.[6]
Wickmayer Y.
6-37-5
Zhu L.[4]
Raina A.
6-16-3
Linette M.[3]
Mladenovic K.
4-67-656-2
Sun L.
Blinkova A.
6-47-66
R32
Maria T.[7]
Bouchard E.
7-657-65
Han N.
Back D.
6-16-1
Zhu L.[4]
Jang S.
6-36-4
Linette M.[3]
Hartono A.
6-27-5
Sun L.
Cabrera L.
7-666-2
Gasanova A.
Sharma A.
7-57-5
Marino R.[8]
Fett J.
6-16-2
Mladenovic K.
Park S.
6-44-66-3
Wickmayer Y.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-16-4
Raducanu E.[6]
Uchijima M.
6-26-4
Alexandrova E.[2]
Muhammad A.
6-13-66-1
Birrell K.
Hon P.
6-44-66-4
Ostapenko J.[1]
Jeong B.
6-43-67-62
Raina A.
Inglis M.
4-67-56-1
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Paquet C.
6-26-2
Blinkova A.
Gracheva V.[5]
6-47-61