Nicholas David Ionel vs Filip Misolic — Sibiu CH Quarter-final

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Nicholas David Ionel
ROU
Nicholas David Ionel
#807ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT2
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Ionel N.
6-2 6-3
Misolic F.
Ionel N.
662
Misolic F.
230

Nicholas David Ionel defeated Filip Misolic 6-2 6-3 in the Sibiu CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ionel N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ionel N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ionel N.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ionel N.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
3
79
Break points saved·Dominant
36
91
Break points won·Clear edge
41
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ionel N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Misolic F.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ionel N.
0-67-666-3
Fatic N.
Coria F.[1]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3