Ivan Gakhov vs Giovanni Fonio — Sibiu CH Round of 16

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1319Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Gakhov I.
6-4 6-2
Fonio G.
Gakhov I.
662
Fonio G.
420

Ivan Gakhov defeated Giovanni Fonio 6-4 6-2 in the Sibiu CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Fonio G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Fonio G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Fonio G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Fonio G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
6
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
63
Break points won·Even
9
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Fonio G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+65 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1319
6.0Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ionel N.
0-67-666-3
Fatic N.
Coria F.[1]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3