Nerman Fatic vs Louis Wessels — Sibiu CH Round of 16
Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
6.4
Surface form4.8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.7
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Fatic N.
6772
Wessels L.
3640
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form59%1st serve in+5%64%
68%1st serve points won+2%70%
50%2nd serve points won+3%47%
61%Service points won+1%62%
39%Return points won+2%37%
58%Break points saved+4%62%
5.3Aces / match+0.74.6
2.4Double faults / match+1.43.8
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64