Nerman Fatic vs Ivan Gakhov — Sibiu CH Quarter-final

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Fatic N.
6-4 6-0
Gakhov I.
Fatic N.
662
Gakhov I.
400

Nerman Fatic defeated Ivan Gakhov 6-4 6-0 in the Sibiu CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
82
Break points won·Dominant
36
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Gakhov I.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.2+94 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1384
5.8Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1430
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.4
Surface form
5.3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ionel N.
0-67-666-3
Fatic N.
Coria F.[1]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3