Marcos Giron vs Daniel Evans — San Diego Semi-final

San Diego · ATP · Semi-final
Marcos Giron
USA3
Marcos Giron
#92ATP
1718ELO
1704Hard ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
Daniel Evans
GBR1
Daniel Evans
#385ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Giron M.
6-3 7-5
Evans D.
Giron M.
672
Evans D.
350

Marcos Giron defeated Daniel Evans 6-3 7-5 in the San Diego semi-final on hard. Marcos Giron narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Marcos Giron closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-13LondonSFgrassMarcos Giron5-7 6-2 1-6
2021-08-30US OpenR64hardDaniel Evans6-4 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3
2021-02-01Murray River OpenR16hardDaniel Evans6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Giron M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Giron M.Evans D.
29
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Giron M.Evans D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giron M.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
62
73
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Clear edge
42
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
89
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giron M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Evans D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+142 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1562
7.2Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1588
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
6.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Giron M.Evans D.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
100

Giron M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d) · Evans D.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[5]
Giron M.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Giron M.[3]
Evans D.[1]
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Evans D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Galan D.
6-34-66-4
Oconnell C.
Brooksby J.[2]
6-44-67-5
Giron M.[3]
Duckworth J.[7]
7-656-3
R16
Evans D.[1]
Daniel T.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[5]
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Galan D.
Martinez P.[4]
5-76-16-4
Brooksby J.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-43-66-2
Lestienne C.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-16-3
Giron M.[3]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Krueger M.
6-37-64
Oconnell C.
Wolf J.[8]
6-37-5
R32
Oconnell C.
Kubler J.
4-66-30-0
Lestienne C.
Holt B.
5-77-656-3
Etcheverry T.
Mena F.
7-666-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-54-66-1
Kudla D.
Verdasco F.
6-36-3
Galan D.
Huesler M.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Svajda Z.
7-57-65
Mcdonald M.
Laaksonen H.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Nava E.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Wolf J.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-27-66
Tabilo A.[6]
Johnson S.
7-56-2